Skip to main content

Hear me out: why I'm a monarchist

Since moving abroad, I have got a lot of questions about my opinion on the British royal family. When I lived in France, the general consensus was that the mere existence of a royal family is elitist and undemocratic. Now that I am in Sweden, a country that also has a monarchy, people tend to be surprised at my royalist tendencies. For them, the monarch doesn’t do a lot. Some people I have met couldn’t even tell you their King’s name. Even those who are well-versed in the merits of constitutional monarchies are still surprised when I say I favour their existence. So here goes, this is why I think the monarchy is useful to keep around.

First, I would like to clarify that I support the British constitutional monarchy. I think it works for us – I don’t agree with my friends who think that all of Romania’s problems would be solved if they reinstated the monarchy. For me, the British royal family is an asset because it has evolved through time. In countries where the sovereign was unwilling to move away from absolutism, I can understand why revolution was necessary to remove the yoke of absolute rule. However, the English (and then British) monarchy has never really been absolutist, its powers have been limited since 1215. Sweden is a bit different, their monarchs swung from absolutism to constitutionalism until eventually landing on constitutionalism. But even then, it remains true that the most democratic countries in the world tend to be constitutional monarchies (and not republics). As the table below demonstrates, there is nothing innately undemocratic about having a monarchy, and certainly nothing inherently democratic about being a republic. For me, the existence of a constitutional monarchy is a symbol of a tradition of democratic values.


Having established that a constitutional monarchy can be extremely democratic, let’s consider what got me thinking about this issue in the first place. As it happens, what inspired me to write on this topic is a show I have never seen. The Netflix series The Crown made waves last year after dramatizing Prince Charles and the late Princess Diana’s love story, and, more importantly, its unravelling. My fear was that this show might reignite doubts about Prince Charles’ fitness to become King. I don’t have particularly strong opinions about Prince Charles – I like him insomuch as he is an environmentalist – but I have no particular loyalty to him as a person. However, he will one day become King, and I think it’s important that the British people like their monarch. Queen Elizabeth II is an icon. She is known worldwide and is well-respected, and dare I say it, loved.

In April last year, when the pandemic had just started, hundreds of people were dying every day in the UK, and people were scared. I was far away from home, in lockdown in France. When Queen Elizabeth made her extraordinary speech on the 5th of April, I cried. As I have said, I am not particularly attached to the Queen’s person; I don’t read the tabloids, I pay minimal attention to the royal gossip. But when Her Majesty said the words, “We should take comfort that while we may have more still to endure, better days will return: we will be with our friends again; we will be with our families again; we will meet again” I was quite overcome. 24 million people listened to that speech on the 5th of April. From my perspective, when the Queen speaks, she makes the UK a nation.

In essence, I believe that having a monarch who is both popular and respected is above all useful. The current British government is like Marmite, you either love them or you hate them. I for one have very little faith in the Prime Minister and his cronies. We need someone to rally around: the Queen has an important unifying role, and by jingo is she good at it.

A few days ago, hero of the British nation, Captain Sir Tom Moore, died from coronavirus, having raised almost £33 million for the National Health Service. People capable of inspiring an entire country don’t come around that often, but Captain Tom showed and continues to show the value of uniting people around a common cause. When he died, I texted my family: “What hope is there for the nation?” I am not a nationalist, but in times like these we need someone who can bring us all together. When a national hero isn’t around anymore, a loved monarch is a pretty good alternative.

This article was originally published on TheLatest.com

Popular posts from this blog

We Need To Talk About "Bridgerton" (spoiler alert)

My social media has been spammed lately with fans of the programme Bridgerton lamenting the departure of the much-loved Duke of Hastings (Simon) played by RegĂ©-Jean Page. The seriousness with which people have taken this is what I am lamenting. No, @regejean ! You CANNOT leave me like that. I WILL NOT have it! @bridgerton !!!!!! — Dionne Warwick (@dionnewarwick) April 3, 2021 I have an admittedly unpopular opinion on the programme Bridgerton, in that I think it is objectively bad. Bridgerton is a Netflix series based on a series of novels by Julia Quinn. The programme is set in London during the reign of King George III, and the first series followed the life of the upper-class Daphne Bridgerton, and her courtship with the aforementioned Duke of Hastings during her first season out. Daphne and Simon Bridgerton, Netflix I watched the first series of Bridgerton upon the recommendation of several friends, and I had (relatively) high hopes. I really like period dramas, and I am a fan of...

Power Play at the Olympics

I have really enjoyed these Olympics. We have been treated to new sports, surprise victories (naming no names, Italy), and the usual astonishment when humans achieve the impossible. However, there is always an extremely political side to the Olympics, and that's what I wish to analyse in this article. Superpowers wear gold The term “superpower” was first used in 1944 to describe the UK, US and the USSR. During the 20th century, Britain lost influence and, with the collapse of the USSR in 1991, the US became the only superpower. This led Samuel Huntington to write : “There is now only one superpower. But that does not mean that the world is unipolar [rather] a uni-multipolar system with one superpower and several major powers.” So what we can learn about the current world order from this year’s Olympics? It's no secret that sport isn't the only thing in play during the Olympic Games. Many will remember the US boycotting the 1980 Olympics in Moscow, and medal races between Ru...

Down and Out in Paris and London

Take a look at these two graphs. Depicted on the left is the number of COVID-19 cases reported daily in the United Kingdom. The peak of the epidemic seems to have been in early April, with almost 9’000 cases on the worst day. On the right, we see France, whose peak came in late March, with almost 8’000 cases. I notice two things when I look at these graphs: Many more cases have been reported in the UK than in France, both as a daily average and in total; Whilst France had got through the worst of its epidemic by early May, the UK is still reporting well over a thousand cases every day, months after its first reported case. I don’t think now is the right time to try to draw complex comparisons between these two countries, but I do want to take a moment to write down my experiences under lockdown/confinement in Britain and France. At a time when the rest of Europe seems to be creeping back to normalcy, the UK is floundering. I cannot help but notice a stark difference between what I ex...