Skip to main content



Who was this statement even aimed at? Theresa May addresses the public but her words are entirely political - she is unable to put her agenda on hold to speak candidly for even one minute. Now would be the time to be honest with us; instead she infiltrates her speech with more pro-Brexit propaganda.
She says that she won't delay Brexit past June, because we have already waited three years to leave the EU. First of all, who is 'we'? It certainly doesn't include me. But then again, this is typical of the UK's 'representative' democracy.
My fate was decided in 2016 by a fraction who voted Leave. Then it was sealed in 2017 by an electorate that voted Tory. Now, when I am finally of voting age, that question doesn't come back to me, because our dear PM would rather leave it in the hands of 27 European Heads of State (which, by the way, she would not have had to do if she hadn't spent the last 3 months running down the clock asking Parliament the same questions multiple times, and then asking the EU to renegotiate the same deal over and over again, despite them consistently refusing to do so). And this, in the country known to be the Mother of Democracy, I beg of you.
Theresa May refuses to hold a second referendum. She says: "We asked you the question already, and you gave us your answer." Yet why is it ok for you to try and make Parliament pass a deal three times? The 2016 referendum resulted in 51.9% of voters (not even the country) voting Leave, which somehow became the Will of the People. Theresa May's deal was rejected by Parliament in the biggest government defeat in history, which, in May's eyes, seems to be a mere inconvenience. What logic, therefore, to defy a second referendum on the grounds that the question has already been asked and answered!
Don't tell me, Prime Minister, that you understand that we are sick of Brexit dominating politics, when other issues are at stake, when it is you that triggered Article 50. Don't tell me, that you are 'on my side'. In 9 days I might be left sans papiers (not to mention the recession we can feel in the air) and yet you continue this charade of trying to bully Parliament into accepting a deal which few would have even dared to present. Please, let the farce end here.

Popular posts from this blog

We Need To Talk About "Bridgerton" (spoiler alert)

My social media has been spammed lately with fans of the programme Bridgerton lamenting the departure of the much-loved Duke of Hastings (Simon) played by RegĂ©-Jean Page. The seriousness with which people have taken this is what I am lamenting. No, @regejean ! You CANNOT leave me like that. I WILL NOT have it! @bridgerton !!!!!! — Dionne Warwick (@dionnewarwick) April 3, 2021 I have an admittedly unpopular opinion on the programme Bridgerton, in that I think it is objectively bad. Bridgerton is a Netflix series based on a series of novels by Julia Quinn. The programme is set in London during the reign of King George III, and the first series followed the life of the upper-class Daphne Bridgerton, and her courtship with the aforementioned Duke of Hastings during her first season out. Daphne and Simon Bridgerton, Netflix I watched the first series of Bridgerton upon the recommendation of several friends, and I had (relatively) high hopes. I really like period dramas, and I am a fan of...

Power Play at the Olympics

I have really enjoyed these Olympics. We have been treated to new sports, surprise victories (naming no names, Italy), and the usual astonishment when humans achieve the impossible. However, there is always an extremely political side to the Olympics, and that's what I wish to analyse in this article. Superpowers wear gold The term “superpower” was first used in 1944 to describe the UK, US and the USSR. During the 20th century, Britain lost influence and, with the collapse of the USSR in 1991, the US became the only superpower. This led Samuel Huntington to write : “There is now only one superpower. But that does not mean that the world is unipolar [rather] a uni-multipolar system with one superpower and several major powers.” So what we can learn about the current world order from this year’s Olympics? It's no secret that sport isn't the only thing in play during the Olympic Games. Many will remember the US boycotting the 1980 Olympics in Moscow, and medal races between Ru...

Down and Out in Paris and London

Take a look at these two graphs. Depicted on the left is the number of COVID-19 cases reported daily in the United Kingdom. The peak of the epidemic seems to have been in early April, with almost 9’000 cases on the worst day. On the right, we see France, whose peak came in late March, with almost 8’000 cases. I notice two things when I look at these graphs: Many more cases have been reported in the UK than in France, both as a daily average and in total; Whilst France had got through the worst of its epidemic by early May, the UK is still reporting well over a thousand cases every day, months after its first reported case. I don’t think now is the right time to try to draw complex comparisons between these two countries, but I do want to take a moment to write down my experiences under lockdown/confinement in Britain and France. At a time when the rest of Europe seems to be creeping back to normalcy, the UK is floundering. I cannot help but notice a stark difference between what I ex...